Trauma Informed Care: When Trauma Emerges During Counseling

Posted on September 11, 2025October 16, 2025 by Mark Moran

Trauma Informed Care highlights the reality of trauma as a universal human experience. Whether deeply effected to the point of PTSD, long term effects or no effects at all, traumatic events do occur and leave an imprint on some individuals. Ultimately, the these events occur but it is our experience and how it effects ourselves that determine impairment later in life. Unfortunately, most traumatic cases, especially in abuse, never go reported and individuals live with unresolved trauma that manifests in many maladaptive ways later in life. TIC looks to uproot trauma when identifying various symptoms that point towards it possible existence. Hence, if one is counseling from a TIC perspective, then it is only natural that eventually trauma will re-emerge in a victim/survivor/client.

When someone discloses abuse or trauma, the counselor needs to understand how to listen, and help the victim/survivor heal. Please also review AIHCP’s Behavioral Health Certifications

Obviously basic counseling and advanced counseling skills and techniques all play a key role in helping the individual discuss these difficult events in his/her life, but there are also particular skills key to addressing trauma that are essential. While TIC looks to search for trauma, trauma specific interventions are essential to help the person express and heal from the trauma. In addition, how the trauma is discussed and handled within the counseling room is equally key. In this blog, we will look at trauma, its sources, counselor reaction to the client, discussing trauma itself, and ways to better facilitate the discussions of trauma itself.

Please also review AIHCP’s Trauma Informed Care programs, as well as all of AIHCP’s Behavioral and Mental Health Programs in Grief Counseling, Crisis Intervention, Stress Management, Anger Management and Spiritual Counseling programs.

Trauma Lurks Below

We are well aware that the traumatic events are universal and 70 percent of the population will experience some type of trauma. Of course how the trauma affects the person has numerous subjective factors based upon the person and many surrounding aspects. Ellis points out that individuals in childhood have different levels of exposure to trauma based on their Adverse Childhood Experiences (2022). ACE refers to these adverse childhood experiences and categorizes them as actual events but also deeper seeded social issues that act as roots to the trauma tree and its many branches and fruits. Adverse Community Environments or roots of the problem include multiple negative social issues such as poverty, discrimination, community disruption, lack of economic mobility and opportunity, poor housing and frequent exposure to social violence. These horrible things manifest into various possible traumatic experiences for individuals that will shape them for the rest of their lives. This includes issues that the child might experience at a young age such as maternal depression, emotional, physical and sexual abuse, substance abuse, domestic violence, homelessness, incarceration of self or family members, divorces, physical and emotional neglect and exposure to mental illness (Ellis, 2022).

In turn, later in adolescence and life, fruits of these abuses and traumas will emerge. Behaviors that include drug use, alcoholism, smoking, lack of physical activity and lack of work ethic. In addition, these fruits can manifest in severe obesity, diabetes, depression, suicide attempts, STDs, heart disease, cancer, stroke and various injuries. TIC looks to identify these warning signs and fruits of ACE and acknowledges that not every one’s life was calm, peaceful and loving. This is not to say even the most loving home can face loss and trauma or violent crime, but it does awaken us as a while that people are just much nurture as they are nature in what they become and how their behaviors exhibit themselves. This is why as counselors, we must show empathy even to undesired behaviors. We are not dismissing choice, or condoning bad behaviors or life styles or even later criminal actions, but we are putting a spot light on a great systematic breakdown in society as a whole and how trauma can alter and turn so many people into persons they would never have been. The role of a counselor when facing emerging trauma in counseling is to help the person find peace with the past, cope in the present and find hope in the future.

Shattered but Not Broken

I believe that despite horrible trauma, one can be shattered, but it does not mean one has to be permanently broken. One will always have the scars from that trauma, one will have a far different life due to it as well, but that does not mean it breaks the person. While some may become overwhelmed and lose themselves or become the evil itself that destroyed them, it does not have to be that way.

Individuals who suffer trauma and abuse may be shattered but through a caring counselor and support can find healing and a new self actualization

Trauma can be like the story of the comic hero Batman, who as a child witnessed the murder of his parents, only to turn that trauma and pain into a life long crusade against crime. While a fictional character, I think still, if we look at the story of young Bruce Wayne and his traumatic experience, we can take a lesson from it and see how when trauma is properly processed, while life altering, it can bring out resiliency and growth, and an ability to find meaning.

Outside TIC mindsets, most trauma survivors who are shattered are afraid to bring up the past in counseling and rarely spontaneously disclose their trauma. (Sweeney. A, 2018). It is hence important to understand how to help heal the broken through discussion of trauma and how to facilitate healing. Cochran points out that all human beings are in a state of “becoming” We are constantly changing whether into a traumatic event or out of it, we are never the same but learning how to adjust. Who we are today are not who we were in the past but we are constantly in flux in our experiences and how we interpret them (2021, p. 8). All individuals look however to meet a certain self actualization of self. These self actualizations when molded in a healthy and loving trauma free environment possess healthy concepts of self image and self worth. Trauma and abuse can destroy these images (Cochran, 2021, p. 9-15). Cochran uses the oak tree as an example of self actualization. While the mighty oak is the final concept of what we see as the fullest potential of an acorn, or small sapling, sometimes, those who are victims of abuse or trauma are unable to fulfill their initial abilities or design. Like a young tree that was struck by lightening or partially uprooted, the ideal self actualization has been altered. Unlike a tree though, human beings have far better abilities to recreate image and self actualization. Although shattered, altered and changed, human beings through guidance and support can still grow and meet new goals and fulfill new self actualizations, albeit shatter, but not broken (Cochran, 2021, p. 11-12).

Hence, Cochran points out that as a person develops, like a tree, one can develop and grow without interruption, while others trees may experience difficult times of drought, poor soil, damage, or broken limbs. Each life experience is different and through trauma, individuals develop different self concepts of what is regular or normal as well as what to expect of oneself. Trauma hence can be very damaging. It is important in TIC to find this trauma and to help the shattered find wholeness again and a new way to exist with the past. When trauma is discovered in counseling or finally disclosed, it is hence important to know how to cultivate the discussion and navigate the difficult discussions.

The Calm in the Storm: Counselor Qualities in Trauma Informed Care

Counselors in general need to display certain qualities with their clients but this is especially true in the case of trauma victims or trauma survivors. Karl Rogers approached all counseling in a very client based approach that emphasized complete emotional support via empathy, genuineness and unconditional positive regard. These three qualities not only create a safe environment for disclosure but also helped create a sense of trust between counselor and victim that facilitated healing. Robin Gobbel, LMSW, emphasizes the importance of safety and the necessity of “felt safety” within between the counselor and the victim or survivor or client. Many individuals who are victims of trauma feel chronic “danger, danger” feelings. Due to PTSD, certain triggers can alert the brain to the dangers that are not truly present. The lack of the prefrontal cortex to dismiss the false alarm is not present in trauma survivors. Hence the scent of a cologne similar to a molester, or a car backfiring in a public street can send a trauma survivor into a flight, fright or freeze sense. Helping a person feel safe internally is hence key. In addition to internal issues, “felt safety” also applies to the counseling room itself. In previous blogs, we discussed the importance of agencies creating a environment that promotes a safe feeling for the individual to disclose and discuss the abuse or trauma. They must feel private, secure and free of threat, free of retribution, or even judgement. Physical environment can be helpful in this, but it also must be accompanied with the counselor’s ability to implement basic counseling skills, via word use, tone, body language and facial expressions.

A counselor can supply empathy, genuineness, and unconditional positive regard for the victim.

This is all best implemented through empathetic listening, genuine interest and unconditional positive regard. Empathetic listening is not judgmental but it allows oneself to not feel what one thinks another should feel, but attempts to understand and share what one is feeling and why. Cochran describes empathy as feeling with the client (2021, p. 79). Empathy can be emitted by sharing the same emotions and words that describe those emotions with the client. Empathy does not require one agreeing with the client, their beliefs, choices or actions, but it does involve walking with the client and attempting to understand all the things that make him/her feel the way he/she does.

In addition to empathy, Karl Rogers emphasized the importance of being genuine. Rogers pointed out that the therapist is being him/herself without professional facade of being all knowing or merely a person with letters behind his/her name. Rogers continued that the counselor needs to be genuine in the feelings of the moment and aware of those moments where feelings are expressed. Ultimately, the therapist becomes transparent and down to earth with the client without any ulterior motives but the healing of the client. This helps the client see that the therapist is truly there to help and more willing to open and disclose issues (Cochran, 2021, p. 132). Ultimately, Cochran points out that all counselors if they seek to be genuine need to know oneself and express oneself.

Tying together empathy and genuineness is the key Rogerian concept of Unconditional Positive Regard for a client. This concept is a cornerstone for counseling. It is also sometimes a difficult concept. It does not mean that the counselor again always agrees with beliefs, choices, or actions of a client, but it does entail an unwavering support for the client/victim/survivor that looks not for an agenda or conditional response but a gentle guidance of self development that does not demand but instead listens, nods and recommends without condition. Studies have shown that when conditions are tied to change, change becomes far more difficult. Unconditional Positive Regard retains the autonomy of the client to learn how to change on their own terms.

Rogers listed warmth, acceptance and prizing as three key elements of UPR. Warmth represents the care of the client and genuine empathy. It is the fertile soil that produces a an atmosphere of trust and disclosure. Acceptance is the ability of the counselor without bias to accept the immediate emotions of a person in counseling-whether illogical, angry, hateful, confused or resenting (Cochran, 2021, p. 103). In trauma, many emotions that are sputtered out are helpful in healing. If they are diagnosed, judged or refuted, then this can stunt disclosure. Trauma victims or survivors need a place to express their feelings anytime and anyway without judgement. Acceptance allows the person to express without regret. Many times, the emotions displayed can help the counselor see clues to past incidents, or even help understand the current emotional state of the person. Cochran points out that when a person is allowed to swear, scream, express, or seem illogical without reproach, many times, they will re-evaluate their own reactions in a healthy way (2021, p. 103). Finally, prizing is a concept of UPR that emphasizes the person as a treasure and someone special who is unique and special. Prizing is not an overstatement or infatuation but is a sensitive way of caring and a genuine way of expressing to the client that he/she matters (Cochran, 2021. p. 104). Prizing despite the pain and downfalls, also looks to lift the person up by highlighting the strengths of the person and helps encourage the person to healing and change. Rogers believed that UPR helps clients discover who they truly are. He believed that self-acceptance leads to real change. Through full expression of the spectrum of emotions, one can in a safe environment see the counselor acceptance and hence accept themselves in expressing issues and trauma (Cochran, 2021, p.109-110).

We cannot put agendas, our own judgements, moral beliefs, or expected outcomes upon clients. Some clients in trauma need certain environments to feel safe to heal, or they need to feel that their story has no conditions that must be met. When counselors put agendas on the table, expect outcomes, or think they know better, then their regard becomes conditioned which is detrimental to disclosure and healing (Cochran, 2021, p. 114-116). Many times, well trained analytic minded counselors have a difficult time displaying pragmatic solutions or just letting go of an agenda or idea and instead just listening and being present. Hard to like clients, bad people in the prison system, moral differences, and biased initial thoughts can all play negative roles in how we show unconditional positive regard for a client (Cochran, 2021, p119-121). It is hence important to see each client, no matter who, as a person that is there to be helped and hopefully understood. This does not mean suggestions are guidance are not given, but it does mean, an acknowledgement of the client’s current state and an attempt to understand why. The biggest question should not be “WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU” but instead “WHAT HAPPNED TO YOU” (Sweeney, A. 2018).

Discussing the Trauma

The concept of trauma can be difficult to discuss. Many clients feel embarrassed, or fear judgement or retaliation if they speak. Others may feel weak if they express traumatic injuries. Others may have in the past attempted to tell but where quickly dismissed. Others may have been difficult ways expressing verbally abuse due to PTSD. Many trauma survivors have a difficult time chronologically making sense of the story but vivid scents, sights, or touches can open the emotional part of the brain. Hence those who experience trauma in many cases fear labeling when discussing trauma (Sweeney, A. 2018).

Learning how to discuss trauma is important in trauma informed care to avoid re-traumatization

Questions about trauma hence need to be done in a safe environment with genuineness and empathy and with a sensitivity about the story. Questions about trauma are usually better during assessment than when in actual crisis. They can be asked within the general psychosocial history of the client to avoid a feeling of purposeful probing. In addition, it is important to preface trauma with a normalizing comment that does not make the person feel like the exception to the rule. The person should feel completely free not to disclose or discuss details that upset him/her (Sweeney, A, 2018).

Sweeney recommends that for those who disclose or are tentative about disclosure that it is s good thing to disclose and that the person is completely safe from the person, judgement, or labeling. If the person does not wish, details should not be dissected from the story. In addition, it is sometimes helpful to help the person slowly enter into the traumatic story by first discussing the initial part of the day prior and then the after feelings before diving deep into the intensity of the story. The counselor should be aware of any changes in the person’s triggers and reactions to re-telling the story. The counselor should discuss if this story has ever been told before and if so, how the other party reacted to the story, as well as how the past trauma affects their current life, especially if maladaptive coping is taking place. When trauma is disclosed, particular trauma specific treatments may be need employed to help healing. In some cases, the counselor or social worker is clinical and can supply those services, but if not, and non-clinical or pastoral in nature, the counselor will need to refer the person to an appropriately licensed, trained and trusted colleague. Finally, following any disclosure, it is critical to check on the person’s emotional state to avoid re-traumatizing the person. This is important because individuals could leave the session feeling less safe and return to maladaptive coping later in the day or even worse, suicidal ideation or attempts. Follow up is key and consistent monitoring. (Sweeney, 2018).

One important note, if the trauma and abuse is current, counselors and social workers, and certain clergy pending on the nature of disclosure and state laws, except within the seal of Catholic/Orthodox confession, have the legal obligation to report abuse.

Facilitating Better Trauma Response

To respond better to the needs of those in trauma due to abuse, it is key to better facilitate responses to individuals who are dealing with past or present trauma, whether in the counseling room, or short term crisis facilities. It is even crucial to better respond to those in trauma who are in longer term facilities, or even correctional facilities.

Individuals who suffer from trauma fear labeling, lack of control in decisions, judgement, retribution and lack of safety. Counselors and facilities need to make them feel safe

A team that responds to victims of trauma with no judgement and empathy is key but this involves dismissing older notions. Notions that dismiss holistic biopsychosocial models for mental distress and only highlight biomedical focus can play a role in impeding healing. Instead of merely prescribing a medication and taking a pill, alternative practices need to be supplementing with many individuals. In addition, agencies need better exposure to social , urban, cultural and historical traumas that underline the person’s makeup. They also need to dismiss notions that treatment involves assessment and conditional parameters for healing that involves an imbalance of power. In these cases, the caregivers have power over the person, make the decisions, and determine the outcomes. In many cases, these same types of lack of control for the abused can cause re-traumatization (Sweeney, 2018). For instance, not granting a person a say in what they do or take, or unnecessarily constraining an individual can all be triggers to the original abuse.

Ultimately, many agencies and facilities do not have a good trauma informed care plan, as we discussed in other blogs. In addition, they are underfunded, staff is stressed and morale may be low and the facility may staff shortages. This leads to stressed, under trained, and confused lower staff members in dealing with patients. In addition, many of the higher staff in counseling are themselves facing burnout, overwhelmed with paperwork or dealing with inconsistent policies or social networking that never follows through (Sweeney, 2018). We can hence see the many challenges that facilities and agencies face but the goal and mission must still remain the same to overcome these pitfalls and introduce real healing strategies for individuals experiencing crisis, trauma and abuse.

Conclusion

When someone discloses trauma or abuse, it is a big moment in that person’s life. Each person with their abuse story is different. Some have other underlying issues. Some may have been mocked or not believed, while others may be maladaptively coping. It is imperative to reach back to each person and give them the security and dignity he/she deserves in disclosing the story. The counselor must be empathetic, genuine and provide as Rogers calls it, Unconditional Positive Regard. Older methods of understanding trauma and assessment and conditional plans need dismissed the counselor needs to help the person validate emotions and find constructive ways to heal. The counselor must be well versed in how to discuss trauma related issues and be careful not only of their own burnout but also in re-traumatizing the client. Facilities also need to reassess their own mission and policies in helping those in abuse find better solutions and healing.

Please also review AIHCP’s Trauma Informed Care programs, as well as its other multiple behavioral health certifications in grief, crisis, anger and stress management

Please also review AIHCP’s Behavioral Health Certifications, especially in Grief Counseling, Crisis Intervention and Trauma Informed Care

Additional Blogs

Attending Skills: Click here

Responding Skills: Click here

Trauma Informed Care: Click here

Resources

Cochran, J & Cochran, N. (2021). “The Heart of Counseling: Practical Counseling Skills Through Therapeutic Relationships” 3rd Ed. Routledge

Sweeny, A, et al. (2018). “A Paradigm Shift: Relationships in Trauma-Informed Mental Health Services” Cambridge University Press

Additional Resources

“Childhood Trauma & ACES”. Cleveland Clinic. Access here

Olenick, C. (2025). “Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Examples and Effects”. WebMD. Access here

“The Challenge of Disclosing Your Abuse”. Saprea. Access here

Schuckman, A. (2024). “Disclosing Abuse: How to Show Support and Break Stigmas”. Nationwide Children’s. Access here

Engel, B. (2019). “Helping Adult Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse to Disclose #4”. Psychology Today. Access here

Trauma Informed Care: Dynamics of Abuse and Power

Posted on September 3, 2025November 18, 2025 by Mark Moran

Those who suffer abuse can sometimes fall through the cracks of society. Individuals, organizations, churches, establishments, or others can indirectly or directly be the cause of ignoring abuse and allowing to continue due to internal false notions, or external fears. Those in pastoral care, healthcare or mental health must be the final line of defense in identifying abuse. This may result in identifying initial abuse simply through a medical checkup, or a casual statement to the school counselor, or concerned friend, but sometimes, abuse is discovered years and years later in counseling. This is why it is so critical to make trauma informed care such a critical aspect of all counseling. So many issues emerge in life that are connected to unresolved trauma and it is so important for professionals report it as well as if within the scope of one’s practice to treat it. Counselors and pastors need to see themselves as guardians and watchers for abuse and trauma in all individuals.

Trauma Informed Care experts know how to identify trauma and abuse and how to help others overcome it. Please also review AIHCP’s Behavioral Health Certifications

In this article, we will shortly look at the nature of abuse and the dynamics of power and its role in covering abuse.

Please also review AIHCP’s Mental and Behavioral Health programs in Trauma Informed Care, Grief Counseling, and Crisis Counseling.

Safeguarding and Abuse

Compton and Patterson refer to individuals who protect the innocent from abuse as safeguarders (2024, p. 1). Anyone who wishes to promote a safe environment can be a safeguarder. Whether a observant friend, or those in pastoral ministry, or those within healthcare or mental health agencies. Everyone is called to look out for others whether the person is abused by a stranger, or a friend, or family, or within a religious institution or organization or agency. Compton and Patterson encourage others to be diligent to identify abuse by looking for signs of abuse or possible risks of for potential abuse. They emphasize in addition to looking to also listen to victims with empathy and non-judgmental attitudes that provide a safe place for them to speak. In addition to listening, safeguarding requires equipping the victim/individual/survivor with the tools to heal, build new relationships and find the necessary resources to move forward. Finally, Compton and Patterson emphasize the duty to speak out against abuse, report it and advocate for transparency within organizations that look to hide abuse (2024, p. 2).

Abuse itself is not always physical or sexual in nature, but abuse can also be verbal and emotional and in some cases, these minor forms of abuse can elevate to physical. While physical abuse is constrained to slapping, punching, strangling, burning or restraining and sexual to improper touches, exposure, unconsented recording, or rape itself, verbal and emotional abuse takes far more subtle forms. Emotional and verbal abuse can include guilt tripping, extreme jealousy, constant monitoring, name calling, insulting, sarcasm, threats, ghosting, avoidance and silent treatments (Compton & Patterson, 2024, p. 14). Spiritual abuse at the hand of a partner or even religious leader is common to control and manipulate. Compton and Patterson point out that misuse of scripture can lead to manipulation, especially to donate, or give up possessions, as well as to utilize absolute authority in other’s daily lives. When a religious leader claims undisputed authority from God without checks or balances, that leader is able to order submission to any decisions or actions he or she takes. Ultimately, the person is made to think that their service to the church or religious figure oversteps every other duty in life because the person’s salvation depends upon it (2024, p. 17).

The Power of Authority

Relationships that pend on authority and power of one over another are not partnerships but unequal relationships. When a manager, president, coach, pastor, or priest teaches, speaks, or instructs, there is a sense of power and influence over another (Compton and Patterson, 2024, p. 28). This is not necessarily a structure of evil, but an important part of organization and society, but the inner dynamics of these powers of one over another can lead to evil actions when misused. Rinaldi states, “Abuse flourishes within a system that emphasizes absolute power of leaders, encourages unflinching submission and obedience of followers and avoids meaningful accountability (Compton and Patterson, 2024, p. 26). Authority can easily be corrupted. Authority as a relationship to another carries a huge responsibility. A coach’s responsibility via his/her authority to bring out the best of his/her players, to train them, and teach them and prepare them for games. When this responsibility deviates from these norms, then his/her power is misused and tempted to abuse. Additionally, due to the existence of this relationship, it can easily blur lines and lead to potential misuse of it. Compton and Patterson point out that any leader, pastor, or manager needs to clearly understand the limits and extent of their power, as well as the consequences of misusing that power and the effects of vulnerable individuals under them within this relationship (2024, p. 29).

Many misuse authority. Counselors can help individuals overcome the manipulation.

Those who misuse authority purposely exploit those under their control. To confuse, justify and promote compliance, spiritual leaders will utilize spiritual texts, managers will utilize company goals and professional needs, coaches will use team first mottos or personal goals as ways to contort and confuse the victim. This leads to a grooming phase where those in authority utilize their power to attract the victim outside of the arena of their relationship into other situations. Utilizing scripture, or company goals, or team needs, the perpetrator will work on altering the victim’s conscience and to make them question his/her values. Abusers with authority to cover their crime will look to normalize the abnormal and justify it. For instance, a coach may tell a player that this behavior in the locker room is normal and goes on in all locker rooms across the country. The victim who may be scared to question, or be brainwashed and manipulated into compliance may be in awe of the person, or afraid to lose a job, or a spot on the team. This leads to a cycle of abuse (Compton and Patterson, 2024, p. 31-33). The authority misused also leads to threats later. The abuser who fears accountability or prosecution will use his/her authority to terrify the abused into silence. A priest may tell a young child that no-one will believe them or that if they say anything, they will go to Hell. A politician may tell an intern, that if anything is mentioned, the person will never work in politics again. This disgusting misuse of power and abuse unfortunately happens everyday and it up to those in behavioral health, healthcare and pastoral professionals to uproot it and expose it to the light. This is an important aspect of trauma informed care!

The Dynamics of Authority and Coverup

It is important to realize that many individuals can become complicit in abuse. Some may be more direct, while others are more indirect, but the complicity still remains. Sometimes complicity at even more remote levels protect and shield the most dangerous abuses and keep victims trapped under the spell of dominance. Abusers play a part in abuse by commanding or counseling or consenting to or flattering the perpetrator. They can directly cause it or even participate within it. Others who may not abuse or condone it even play a role in allowing abuse to exist by covering it up, remaining silent, preventing steps to expose, or not openly denouncing it. These individuals in many ways are as dangerous as the abusers. While they may not abuse or have a mental illness to abuse, they care more about image or position or finance than another human being in trauma. Their crimes are an equal problem and a reason why so many institutional abuses continue within many organizations (2024, p. 12-14). Many organizations, churches, schools, or agencies utilize shame, silence, or loyalty above truth. Those who work for schools, universities, sporting teams, church positions, or organizational positions feel the pressure to protect the image of who they associate with, as well as who pays them. In addition, many within cult-like churches will look for the greater good in promoting their silence, or feel as if their salvation is threatened if they question someone of religious authority. This can lead to shame as well to encourage silence and foster the environment for abuse.

Many individuals are pushed into complicity via threats or loss of status when they witness abuse. Individuals must expose the crime at all costs

Compton and Patterson list some key concepts that lead one to complicity and silence. Unity over truth leads those within the organizational structure to silence or dismiss those who call out questionable statements, or patterns or procedures. In this case, the mission of the church or organization overplays the mission to protect individuals. This leads to the greater good motif as well as the needs of the many over the need of the one as a way to justify a crime of abuse. In addition, Compton and Patterson point out that authority over truth leads to the submission of women and children to do without question. If a coach or pastor does something morally questionable, one is told or taught to dismiss it because there is a higher reason for the crime. This leads to diluting the idea that everyone sins or no-one is perfect when comparing it to an actual crime, and then proceeding to forgive the crime as if a minor issue. Others within the organization or church who witness it, then look for reasons to justify the crime of their coach, hero, or pastor. This leads to silence and also internal coverup over an actual crime under the guise of a simple sin that no-one needs to know about and that there must be “good reason” for. In abusive church settings, the congregants are told not to gossip about a potential crime and are pushed to trust their leaders and to also only count on scripture as a source of good counsel over professional resources that would immediately report a crime (2024, p.23)

Trauma informed care probes for these signs of abuse and helps expose it.

Exposing and Preventing Abusive Systems

First, if you feel as a leader in whatever capacity you are over abusing your power and authority beyond its scope and environment, then reel it in and hold oneself accountable. If outside the office, monitor those under your care and limit relationships that are not ethical. Second, if you witness abuse, report it. Do not justify someone’s behavior, normalize it, or belittle a crime.

On a larger scale, trauma informed specialists, mental health and healthcare professionals must become advocates and face organizations that look to hide abuse. This is not only legal and the law but also ethical and moral. Sometimes it may seem whistle blowing is hurting oneself but character and maintaining one’s integrity is far greater than any position. Whistle blowing on a favorite university program may hurt the program, or reporting one’s church may feel as if you endangered the holiness of it, but we need to separate the difference between a crooked and sick individual and our favorite team or church we attend. Instead, we should be enraged that someone would abuse while wearing a collar within our faith, or if a coach would misuse the honor of coaching our favorite team to abuse others or permit abuse under his/her watch. As mentioned earlier, we must be safeguarders and this must be vocational. We are the reformers of our favorite institutions when we do report. We are preserving the future of those institutions by reforming it and removing the scum that has invaded it via reporting it. This is the mindset of a reporter. Criminals must be exposed and removed from society, especially those who misuse power, exploit the vulnerable and emotionally and physically abuse others.

It is important to expose those who hurt the most vulnerable. Please also review AIHCP’s Mental and Behavioral Health programs

Politicians, pastors/priests/bishops, managers/CEOs, and coaches are not above the institution they are in or the people they serve or manage. Their must be complete zero tolerance and complete transparency. The reforms of the Catholic Church, while slow and painful, have produced fruits with more transparency that include not only reporting but also removing the alleged perpetrator with real life consequences. Whether a company, church or university there must clear and unforgiving policies and procedures that let all those who hold authority of the dire consequences that will follow if one is guilty of misuse of power and abuse. This transparency will not taint the view of the organization but actually prove that it cares about the vulnerable and individual over crime. It takes courageous persons in dark times to stand up. Victims are the most courageous by pushing forward and telling their story. Those who report and those who seek to reform institutions are also courageous risking position, status and rejection. Stopping abuse is a community and team effort!

Conclusion

Trauma Informed Care is always looking for signs of past trauma or abuse that may stem across the life span. It looks to expose and challenge any abuser or institution that has committed the crime of abuse or misused authority. As safeguarders, mental health as well as pastoral caregivers must not only help those with trauma and abuse but also be courageous enough to be whistle blowers and advocates for the abused, forcing those who misuse authority to face justice.

Please also review AIHCP’s Mental Health and Behavioral Health Certifications. These programs include Crisis Intervention, Grief Counseling as well as Trauma Informed Care!

Additional Blog

What is Trauma Informed Care? Click here

Resource

Compton, L & Patterson, T. (2024). “Skills for Safeguarding: A Guide to Preventing Abuse and Fostering Healing in the Church”. Intervarsity Press.

Additional Resources

“Reporting Suspected Child Abuse or Neglect: A Guide for Action” Department of Health and Human Services. Access here

“The Psychology of Denial: How Abusers Manipulate, Deflect, and Deceive”. Carolyn Devers. Access here

“Abuse of power: The psychology of abusive relationships” Estaban, P. (2023). In Focus. Access here

Raypole, C. (2025). “How to Recognize the Signs of Emotional Abuse”. Healthline. Access here

Brenner. A. (2020). “10 Red Flag Warning Signs of Abuse”. Psychology Today. Access here