become a certified case manager

Closing the Referral Loop: How Care Coordination Prevents Patients From Falling Through the Gaps

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

Nursing writing on a clipboard

Written by Zain Qayyum,

Continuity of care is usually taught as a clinical idea. The same clinician, or at least the same care team, follows a patient over time so that nothing is forgotten and no decision is made without context.

In day-to-day practice, continuity tends to fail for nonclinical reasons. It fails because a document did not move, a phone call was not made, or a decision sat in a queue that nobody owned. The clinical judgment was sound. The administrative follow-through was not.

Nowhere is this clearer than at the referral. A referral is the moment a patient passes from one organization to another, and it is the point where continuity is most exposed. For case managers, care coordinators, nurse navigators and anyone responsible for a patient across settings, understanding exactly where that hand-off breaks is the difference between a referral that becomes an appointment and one that quietly disappears.

Where Continuity of Care Actually Breaks

A referral looks like a transfer. It behaves like a hand-off.

In a transfer, responsibility moves cleanly from one party to another, and the receiving party confirms they have it. In a hand-off between separate organizations, with separate systems, separate staff, and separate priorities, there is a window where nobody is certain who holds the patient. That window is where continuity is lost.

The scale of this is well documented. A retrospective cohort study of 38,334 specialty referrals to a children’s hospital, published in The Journal of Pediatrics in 2023, found that 62% of referrals resulted in an appointment being scheduled and 54% resulted in a completed visit. Nearly half of referred patients never arrived. The study also found completion was lower for Black patients, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients, Spanish-speaking families and publicly insured patients, which tells us these gaps do not fall evenly.

The communication failure runs in both directions. The landmark Milbank Quarterly review of specialty referrals in the United States described breakdowns at every stage of the referral process, and noted that primary care physicians frequently do not know whether a patient actually attended the specialist, or what the specialist recommended. A referral can be clinically appropriate, accepted, attended, and still fail as an episode of coordinated care, simply because the information never returned to the person who initiated it.

The Six Stages a Referral Passes Through

Most discussion of referral management treats it as a single event. It is more useful to treat it as a sequence, because the failures cluster in specific places.

A referral typically moves through six stages:

  1. The referral arrives, usually as a document.
  2. Someone identifies what it is and extracts the patient and referring provider.
  3. Someone checks insurance and any authorization requirements.
  4. Someone decides which provider and which appointment type it needs.
  5. Someone contacts the patient and books, or records that booking is not possible.
  6. A report goes back to the referring clinician.

Stages That Fail Loudly

Stages one through three fail in visible ways. A document arrives in the wrong place. A name is misread. An authorization requirement is missed, and the claim is denied later.

These failures are frustrating, but they are recoverable, because something or someone eventually notices. A denied claim generates a task. A misfiled document gets found when somebody goes looking for it. The system produces a signal.

Stages That Fail Silently

Stages four and five are different. These are the stages that require a judgment: which provider is right for this patient, what appointment type this warrants, what to do when the patient cannot be reached or cannot be accommodated.

When a judgment has no clearly assigned owner, the referral simply waits. It has been received correctly. It has been read correctly. Nothing about it is wrong. It is sitting in a queue, complete and accurate, waiting for a decision that nobody has been made responsible for making.

Why Silent Failures Are the Hardest to Catch

This is the central problem in referral coordination, and it is worth stating plainly: a referral waiting on a judgment produces no error state.

Every quality process we build is designed to catch wrong things. Exception reports, denial queues, incomplete-record flags. A referral stuck at the provider-matching stage triggers none of them, because by every available measure it is in good order.

The practical test for whether this is happening in your organization takes about a minute. Ask how many referrals arrived last month, and you will get a precise number. Ask how many of those patients were never contacted, and in most organizations you will get an estimate or a pause. The first question counts documents, which systems do well. The second requires knowing what should have happened next, which is a coordination question, not a record-keeping one.

If the second number is not readily available, referrals are almost certainly being lost, and nobody will be able to say how many.

What Care Coordinators Can Measure

Three measures surface silent failure better than referral volume does.

Time From Arrival to First Patient Contact

Not time to filing, and not time to processing. Time from the referral arriving to the moment someone actually speaks to or reaches the patient.

Time to filing is the measure most organizations can produce easily, and it is the one that flatters them. A referral can be filed within an hour and sit unactioned for three weeks. Time to first contact is what the patient experiences, and it is the only one of the two that correlates with whether they eventually attend.

Referrals Received Against Referrals Contacted

A simple ratio, calculated monthly, from two numbers that most organizations hold separately and rarely compare. The gap between them is your leakage, and seeing it as a single figure tends to change the conversation faster than any amount of process mapping.

Look at referrals from two months ago rather than last month, so that anything genuinely still in progress has resolved.

Unbookable Referrals, Counted With Reasons

Some referrals cannot be booked. The patient declines, moves away, is not appropriate for the service, or cannot be reached after reasonable attempts. That is legitimate.

What is not legitimate is for those referrals to leave no record. If a patient cannot be booked, that should be an explicit status with a reason attached, and it should generate a message back to the referring office. Counting these monthly tells you something useful about demand, access and referral quality. Leaving them uncounted means a genuine inability to serve a patient is indistinguishable from an administrative failure to try.

Closing the Loop Back to the Referring Clinician

An appointment attended is not a closed loop. The loop closes when information returns to the clinician who initiated the referral.

This is formalized in CMS Quality ID #374, “Closing the Referral Loop: Receipt of Specialist Report,” which sits in the Effective Communication and Care Coordination domain. The measure holds the referring clinician accountable and asks a single question: did the referring clinician receive a report back from the clinician they referred to?

It is worth noticing what that measure does not ask. It does not ask whether the referral was sent, whether it was received, or whether the patient attended. It asks whether information came back. That reflects something coordinators understand instinctively: a referral where the patient was seen but the referring clinician learned nothing has produced a visit without producing continuity.

For referring offices, the practical consequence is that the single most valuable thing a specialist can send is not the consult note weeks later. It is a short acknowledgment on the day of receipt, confirming the referral arrived and will be actioned, followed by confirmation of what was booked or why it could not be. Those two messages cost almost nothing and resolve the uncertainty that otherwise drives repeat calls, duplicate referrals and patients falling between two organizations each assuming the other holds them.

Both are also the easiest part of the loop to automate, since neither message needs a person to compose it. Sending them reliably is standard in referral workflow tools such as Medsender.

Practical Steps for Care Coordination Teams

Separate the Decision Queue From the Processing Queue

Referrals awaiting a judgment behave completely differently from referrals awaiting processing, and mixing them in one list hides the first behind the second.

Maintain them separately, and make sure the decision list sits in front of the person authorized to make that decision. The volume is usually small. The delay is usually large. It is one of the few changes in this area that costs nothing and shows a difference within a month.

Make the Unbookable Message Standard

Agree on a short, standard message that goes back to the referring office whenever a patient cannot be booked, with the reason. Most organizations have no such message, and the default is silence.

Silence is read by the referring office as the referral having been received and handled. It is the single most common reason a patient is lost while two organizations each believe the other is responsible.

Agree Who Owns the Patient Between Organizations

The window between referral sent and appointment booked is where ownership is genuinely ambiguous. Most referral agreements specify clinical criteria and say nothing about this window.

Write it down. State how long the receiving organization has to make contact, what happens after a set number of failed contact attempts, and at what point responsibility returns to the referring clinician. This is not a technology question, and organizations that answer it clearly lose fewer patients than those with better systems and no agreement.

Conclusion: Continuity Is an Administrative Discipline

Continuity of care is often described as a quality of the clinical relationship. The evidence suggests it is at least as much a property of the administrative process surrounding that relationship.

Nearly half of referred patients in a large cohort study never completed the visit. Referring clinicians routinely do not find out what happened to the patients they sent. Neither of these is a failure of clinical judgment, and neither will be solved by clinical training.

For case managers, care coordinators and anyone holding responsibility for a patient across settings, the useful work is unglamorous and specific. Find the stages where a decision has no owner. Measure contact rather than filing. Say something back when a patient cannot be booked. Agree in writing who holds the patient in the gap.

The referrals that get lost are rarely the complicated ones. They are the ordinary ones, correctly received and accurately recorded, waiting for a decision nobody was asked to make.

Author Bio: Zain Qayyum is co-founder and co-CEO of Medsender, a healthcare workflow automation company. He was studying pre-med and interning in a hospital emergency department when he first saw how much of patient care depends on paperwork moving correctly, and he left pre-med for computer science to work on the problem. He led development of Medsender’s first AI models and the prototype of its voice agent, and writes about referral workflow, document intake and front office operations in specialty practices.

References 

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Quality ID #374: Closing the referral loop: Receipt of specialist report. Quality Payment Program. https://qpp.cms.gov

McDonald, K. M., Schultz, E., Albin, L., Pineda, N., Lonhart, J., Sundaram, V., Smith-Spangler, C., Brustrom, J., Malcolm, E., Rohn, L., & Davies, S. (2014). Care coordination measures atlas update (AHRQ Publication No. 14-0037-EF). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination/atlas.html

Mehrotra, A., Forrest, C. B., & Lin, C. Y. (2011). Dropping the baton: Specialty referrals in the United States. The Milbank Quarterly, 89(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x

Srinivasan, A. P., Sullivan, E., Desai, A., Adiele, A., Bell, S., & Lion, K. C. (2023). Disparities in pediatric specialty referral scheduling and completion. The Journal of Pediatrics, 260, 113485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113485

How Case Managers Connect the Pieces of Fragmented Healthcare 

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

African American medic shows medical test results on digital tablet computer to another doctor. Multicultural doctors discuss ways of treatment in middle of hospital corridor. Medical staff at work.Written by Deepika

No matter how diligently providers play their part, suboptimal care is a known outcome of a fragmented healthcare system. Consider the following scenario that is still commonplace: A patient is discharged with a new medication, a specialist referral, and follow-up instructions with primary care. 

The primary care provider receives part of the discharge information. At the same time, the specialist is working from a different set of records. Meanwhile, the patient is managing a chronic condition through another clinic, waiting for a referral appointment that has not been scheduled. 

Each provider is doing what they can, but nobody has the complete picture. This kind of fragmentation only becomes more complex when patients must navigate multiple parts of the healthcare system. 

In 2025, nearly 12.5 million people across the US were enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid. Again, the two programs operate separately, with different eligibility requirements, benefits, and payment structures. The issue is ensuring that each provider has a shared understanding. 

Case managers can help create a connected process, and this article will explore how. 

 

Tracing Gaps in a Patient’s Care 

Before the fragmented pieces are connected, case managers need to know where those pieces are falling short. This means they would look beyond the immediate reason, be it a referral or recent hospitalization. Essentially, a patient’s larger care landscape would be assessed. 

If we go by recent research, a lot can be uncovered when care is examined across transitions. Take the example of a 2026 study involving 2,426 adults in a pharmacy-driven care transition program. It was discovered that 81.7% of the cases involved at least one medication error. 

Moreover, non-adherence to medication was noted in 45.6% of patients, along with barriers to accessing medication in 12.7% of cases. If a case manager were to fixate their judgment on a single encounter/record, they would not understand the real needs of the patient. 

A broader assessment would bring together information from medical records, the care team, and the patient. On a case-to-case basis, it’s important to look at the following:

  • Incomplete referrals: A recommended specialist or service has not been scheduled or received. 
  • Gaps in follow-ups: Instructions from one care setting have not been carried through to the next. 
  • Medication discrepancies: Medication lists, dosages, or treatment instructions that differ between providers. 
  • Duplicate services: Tests, assessments, or services may be recurring because providers lack visibility into what has already occurred. 
  • Unaddressed barriers: Transportation, cost, access, or other practical issues may make an otherwise relevant care plan challenging to follow. 
  • Missing information: Relevant records, test results, or treatment updates have not reached the provider who needs them. 

A September 2026 report by the American Medical Association on Ochsner Health’s hospital-to-home programs makes the practical importance of identifying such gaps much clearer. Ochsner had 293 patients with congestive heart failure enrolled in its acute care at home program in 2025. 

Although they represented 15% of the program’s home patients, they accounted for 16% of all reutilizations. In response, one of Ochsner’s strategic priorities for 2026 is to improve care coordination for this group. As Dr. Beau Raymond, the Chief Medical Officer for population health at Ochsner, stated, “We needed to be smarter about simple care coordination activities.” 

Also, keep in mind that Ochsner’s approach was not just about analyzing clinical information. It included identifying patients at risk, determining which home-based program fits their needs, and helping case managers navigate available options. Instead of documenting every detail of a patient’s journey, case managers should determine where the care pathway is most likely to break down. 

 

Building Bridges Across Providers and Care Settings 

After the gaps in a patient’s care have been identified, the next challenge is bringing the right people and services into the same care pathway. A case manager may have to coordinate communication between a primary care provider, specialist, hospital team, home health service, or a community-based resource. 

Each of these roles may differ, but that should not prevent the patient’s care from moving forward. The complexity of this coordination can vary depending on where and how a patient receives care. 

For instance, Community CareLink notes that distance and staffing make coordination critical in rural communities. Patients may have fewer healthcare providers nearby, requiring them to travel beyond their local community for certain services. 

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) notes that only 2% of residency training occurs in rural areas. Strengthening rural training will improve access to care and increase the likelihood that physicians practice in these communities. 

For rural health transformation, this can mean coordinating care that extends beyond its immediate network. A case manager may need to connect a patient with an outside specialist, help address scheduling barriers, and ensure the referring provider has all the necessary information. 

Essentially, several practical responsibilities form a part of this bridge-building process. These include the following:

  • Making sure each member of the care team has clear responsibilities 
  • Facilitating communication between professionals working from separate records 
  • Helping move a referral beyond the initial order by checking whether the patient reached the appropriate service 
  • Carrying relevant information and care responsibilities across settings such as hospitals, outpatient clinics, and community services 
  • Incorporating practical support, social services, and other community-based assistance into the broader care plan 

 

Turning Coordination Into Continuity of Care 

Connecting providers is only half of the work done. A patient can still experience a breakdown in their care if they do not receive a follow-up on the next steps. Continuity of care depends on whether the plan still works after those initial connections have been made. 

In other words, the focus of case management here is to keep the connected pieces together. Case managers can monitor whether recommended services were accessed, whether treatment plans are being followed, and whether new barriers have emerged. They also have the chance to analyze the patient’s needs amid changing circumstances. 

According to a recent CBS News feature, continuity of care becomes more difficult when local healthcare resources change. Sturgis Hospital in rural Michigan closed on June 19th, ending services that included surgery, medical imaging, physical therapy, and cardiac rehabilitation. 

The loss of its emergency department also meant that some patients who previously took an approximately 2-mile ambulance ride would now have to travel 25 miles. Situations like this show why continuity requires more than maintaining a list of referrals. Since a facility is no longer available, the patient’s care pathway may have to be rebuilt around what is accessible. 

Case managers play a significant role in that rebuilding process. Maintaining continuity of care may involve the following:

  • Confirming that referrals, appointments, and treatments happened promptly 
  • Watching for changes in the patient’s condition, circumstances, and ability to manage their care plan 
  • Adjusting coordination when a patient’s health or support needs change 
  • Ensuring important updates and responsibilities move with the patient from one stage of care to the next 

The Sturgis example also shows why continuity cannot be treated as a one-time task. The report noted that other clinics remained available after the hospital closed, but the emergency department’s absence left facilities in Three Rivers, Coldwater, and LaGrange, Indiana, as the closest alternatives to patients. 

A case manager can become a crucial link in such fragmentation. Instead of directing a patient to a new provider, they can look through the care plan again to see what has changed. That’s how it’s possible to ensure the next set of services still fit together. This type of attention to detail is particularly relevant in cases where the patient has multiple conditions or practical barriers to overcome. 

 

FAQs 

What problems do case managers help address in fragmented healthcare?

Case managers help identify gaps such as incomplete referrals, medication discrepancies, duplicate services, and practical barriers. They bring together information from different providers and settings to determine whether a patient’s care pathway is breaking down. 

How do case managers improve coordination between healthcare providers?

The way case managers improve coordination is by connecting care providers, facilitating information sharing, and helping carry care plans across different settings. This can be especially important when patients must travel for services or receive care from multiple organizations that do not work together. 

How do case managers help maintain continuity of care?

Case managers follow up after referrals and transitions, monitor changing needs, and adjust care coordination when circumstances change. If a provider or service becomes unavailable, they can help identify alternatives to ensure important information moves with the patient. 

 

Fragmented Healthcare At a Glance 

Care Challenge  Case Management Insight 
Scattered information  Find the missing pieces. 
Incomplete referrals  Follow the referral through.
Conflicting medication records  Reconcile the differences. 
Disconnected providers  Keep communication going.
Care across distant settings  Bridge the gaps between services.
Changing patient needs  Reassess the needs and adapt the care plan accordingly.
Loss of local services  Rebuild the care pathway. 
One-time coordination  Keep care connected.

Fragmentation in healthcare cannot be attributed to a single person or one failed interaction. It can develop when information is scattered across records and referrals lose their momentum. 

Case managers have the unique potential to make the system more connected. A 2026 randomized controlled trial involving 1,387 adults with multiple chronic conditions compared three approaches to case management after hospital discharge. 

While no considerable difference was observed in 90-day readmission rates, in-person care enabled patients to better understand and manage their care over the following year. Successful coordination cannot be determined by a single outcome. To keep a patient’s journey connected over time, multiple factors must be considered and addressed.

Author Bio

Deepika has over six years of experience as a writer and editor. Passionate about words and learning, she takes an interest in a variety of niches. Her knack for turning complex ideas into relatable narratives allows her to resonate with the reader. 

When her pen falls silent, you can find her engrossed in a novel or getting her hands messy with fine arts. Through these, Deepika is committed to keeping her curiosity and creativity alive. 

References:

  1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. July 2026. Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office Fiscal Year 2025. 

https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mmco-report-congress.pdf-2

  1. Kevin McKeough. Better handoffs help home care cut hospital readmissions. American Medical Association. 

https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/payment-delivery-models/better-handoffs-help-home-care-cut-hospital

  1. Williams Kelly, et al. April 2026. Integrated care for chronic conditions: a randomized care management trial. PubMed. 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41838981/

  1. Rural Residency Planning and Development (RRPD) Program. September 2026. Health Resources & Services Administration. 

https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/grants/rural-health-research-policy/rrpd

 

 

Please also review AIHCP’s Case Management Certification program and our CE courses as well, to see if they meet your academic and professional goals.  These programs are online and independent study and open to qualified professionals seeking a four year certification

6 Doctor Quality Analytics Platforms Powering Value-Based Care in 2026

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

Stethoscope_and_keyboard_illustrating_concept_of_digital

Written by Cassandra Rosas

A doctor being “in-network” answers exactly one question: will the claim get paid. It says nothing about whether that doctor’s patients recover faster, avoid unnecessary procedures, or end up back in the emergency room three weeks later. For years, that gap didn’t matter much because nobody was measuring it at scale, but now a growing number of platforms are, and the results are reshaping how employers, health plans, and the case managers between them make referral decisions. Case managers, more than most people in the system, sit exactly at that intersection: clinically fluent enough to judge a referral, accountable enough for cost that a referral choice actually matters.

Commercial value-based arrangements grew from 34.6% of payments in 2022 to 39.2% in 2023, according to the HCP-LAN annual survey, conducted jointly with AHIP and BCBSA. That shift only works if someone can tell a high-value doctor from an average one, which is exactly the gap these six platforms are built to close. Garner Health tops this list because it’s built the furthest into that specific problem. The rest fill in adjacent pieces of the same puzzle.

What “doctor quality analytics” means for case managers

Ask 10 case managers what “in-network” means and most will describe a directory: a name, an address, a specialty code. Ask them what “high-quality” means for that same doctor and the answers get vague fast, because until recently there wasn’t much data to point to.

Doctor quality analytics platforms replace that vagueness with claims-based measurement: tracking things like complication rates, readmissions, and procedure volume at the individual physician level, then scoring providers against their peers in the same specialty and geography. For a case manager balancing a patient’s outcomes against a plan sponsor’s cost targets, that score is the difference between a referral made on convenience and one made on evidence.

This is the mechanical layer underneath the broader move toward value-based care, where a health plan gets paid, or penalized, based on outcomes rather than visit volume. You can’t manage what you can’t measure, and provider-level quality data is what makes that measurement possible below the plan level, down to the individual referral.

Consider a case manager referring a patient for a routine orthopedic procedure. Under the old model, the choice comes down to who’s in-network and who has an open slot. A quality-analytics model adds a layer: the case manager can see in advance whether one surgeon’s patients tend to need a second procedure within a year and others don’t. That’s the kind of signal that used to live only in a hospital’s internal peer review, if it was tracked at all.

How we selected these platforms

We looked for four things:

  • Claims-based quality data the platform built itself, not self-reported ratings
  • A product built for employers and health plans, not consumer directories
  • The ability to plug into existing navigation or benefits workflows without a rip-and-replace
  • Evidence, ideally quantified, that using the platform actually changes cost or outcomes

Six platforms cleared that bar, ranked here from the most quality-analytics-focused to the most complementary.

6 doctor quality analytics platforms to know in 2026

1. Garner Health

Garner Health built its entire product around one question: which doctors, specifically, produce better outcomes at lower cost? Its scoring engine runs claims data through more than 550 clinical metrics it built in-house, drawing on a database of over 60 billion medical records, to rank physicians within their own specialty and market. Employers use the results to reward employees for choosing top-performing doctors, usually by covering most or all of the resulting out-of-pocket costs, without narrowing the network or restricting anyone’s choice.

The approach appears to be working at a scale that’s hard to ignore. Garner reports that employers using its platform see an average 12% reduction in total healthcare spend in the first year, and employees who choose a high-performing provider pay roughly 80% less out of pocket than they otherwise would. The company closed a $100 million Series E at a $2.74 billion valuation in May 2026, just three months after a $118 million Series D, a pace of investment that reflects how much appetite employers have for this exact category.

2. Embold Health

Where Garner scores individual doctors, Embold Health has taken the model a step further and built a health plan around it. Embold Edge, launched in 2026, analyzes 21 specialties and 68 sub-specialties using data spanning more than 230 million people, then structures member copays to reward high-quality choices without requiring employers to disrupt their existing network or carrier relationships. Its underlying bet: most healthcare waste traces back to low-quality care at the start of a patient’s journey rather than overpricing further downstream, so fixing the first referral fixes a lot of what follows.

3. Ribbon Health

Ribbon Health operates further upstream from the case manager, supplying the provider data (insurance participation, cost estimates, quality scores, and patient experience) that other platforms and health plans build their own navigation tools on top of, rather than selling directly to members itself. If you’ve used a “find a doctor” tool from a health plan or a digital navigation vendor recently, there’s a reasonable chance Ribbon’s data powered it behind the scenes.

4. Included Health

Included Health bundles quality-based referrals into a much broader navigation and virtual care platform. Its Provider Connect feature routes members toward high-quality, cost-effective providers automatically as part of the standard member journey. Care coordination, virtual visits, benefits navigation, and referral steering all live in one product, rather than requiring a separate vendor for each.

5. Quantum Health

Quantum Health takes a similar bundled approach through its Care Finder tool, which surfaces provider search and quality data directly inside its broader healthcare navigation platform. For organizations that already route members through Quantum Health for case management and benefits navigation, Care Finder adds the quality layer without introducing a separate point solution.

6. Turquoise Health

Quality data only tells half the value-based care story. Turquoise Health fills in the other half: rate transparency and contract intelligence that show what providers are actually paid under negotiated agreements. Pairing that pricing data with a quality score from one of the platforms above gets closer to a true value calculation. A genuinely high-value doctor is one who scores well on outcomes and isn’t wildly overpriced relative to peers.

Choosing the right platform for your organization

The right fit depends on what you’re already running. Organizations with an existing navigation vendor that just want to layer in quality scoring are usually better served by a pure-play option like Garner Health or Embold Health. Organizations building navigation and referral management from scratch tend to gravitate toward a bundled platform like Included Health or Quantum Health instead. Vendors and health plans building their own tools look to infrastructure providers like Ribbon Health for the underlying data.

Turquoise Health belongs in the stack alongside any of the above, since cost transparency and quality analytics answer different questions. Worth asking before signing anything: how the platform’s data reaches the people making referral decisions day to day. A quality score buried in a quarterly report to HR doesn’t change a single referral. A quality score surfaced inside the tool a case manager already uses at the point of referral does, and that distinction matters more than any single feature comparison.

Frequently asked questions

What is doctor quality analytics?

Doctor quality analytics is the practice of measuring an individual physician’s performance, including complication rates and avoidable readmissions, using claims data, then scoring that physician against peers in the same specialty and market. It replaces network directories, which only confirm insurance participation, with an evidence-based answer to whether a specific doctor delivers better results.

How do case managers use provider quality data in referrals and care coordination?

Case managers use provider quality scores to steer referrals toward physicians with better documented outcomes, rather than relying solely on network status or personal familiarity. Combined with a patient’s specific clinical needs and plan design, quality data helps a case manager justify a referral choice on evidence, which matters increasingly as employers tie benefits design to demonstrated cost and outcome performance.

Do doctor quality platforms only work for large self-insured employers?

No, though large self-insured employers were the earliest and most visible adopters because they bear healthcare costs directly and can redesign benefits without an insurer’s approval. Health plans, associations, and mid-market employers now access the same underlying quality data through partnerships and smaller-scale deployments, so the category isn’t limited to the biggest balance sheets anymore.

 

Author bio

Cassandra Rosas is a content writer who loves to cover topics related to healthcare software and AI, employee benefits, and new healthcare trends emerging in the industry. In her spare time she enjoys hiking in the mountains and spending time outdoors.

 

Please also review AIHCP’s Case Management Certification program and our CE courses as well, to see if they meet your academic and professional goals.  These programs are online and independent study and open to qualified professionals seeking a four year certification

How Case Managers Can Help Patients Avoid Predatory Treatment Programs 

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

case managers working at a tableWritten by Marchelle Abrahams,

A typical day for Oklahoma City case manager Joe Aitson involves getting people placed in evidence-based treatment programs.

His life could have gone in a completely different direction. Describing his former “criminal mentality,” Aitson tells NPR that his introduction to drugs started when he was a teenager.

Thanks to his recovery, Aitson has found meaning in his addiction. Now he uses his lived experience to help others navigate an already complicated system.

The recovery navigator knows that finding addiction treatment should not be overwhelming and leave you defeated. And yet, for many patients and families, that’s exactly what happens.

Searching in a moment of urgency, they make decisions on the fly. When every website claims to offer “comprehensive care,” it becomes hard to tell what’s real and what’s marketing fluff.

That’s where individuals like Joe Aitson take their roles as case managers seriously. They act not as a coordinator, but as a filter. An advocate. And sometimes the only line of defense between a patient and a bad placement.

A case manager’s role is rarely small. Done well, it can change the entire trajectory of someone’s recovery.

 

The System Patients Are Walking Into 

Most patients don’t enter treatment with a reasonable understanding of how the system works. They’re trying to solve an immediate problem. Stop using. Stabilize. Get help. The details come later, if at all.

The treatment landscape is crowded. Some programs are solid and clinically grounded. Others are not. Investigative journalist and author Shoshona Walter shared firsthand accounts in her book Rehab: An American Scandal.

In it, she points out the same issues over again: aggressive marketing, unclear pricing, and admissions processes that are more like sales calls than clinical assessments.

Then there are policy gaps. A recent opinion piece by Helen King discusses how some states still lag in protecting patients from questionable insurance practices.

In simple terms, patients are being asked to make high-stakes decisions in a system that isn’t always transparent. 

 

Why Case Management Carries So Much Weight 

Case management comprises coordination. In addiction care, it provides protection. 

Case managers ensure that the right level of care is provided to the patients. They also keep an eye on key factors such as housing, employment, mental health, and family dynamics.

That sounds straightforward. But it takes work to slow things down in an environment built around speed.

Red Flags That Should Be Watched

Sometimes, the warning signs manifest early. The problem is spotting them too late, and only after a placement is made.

The Sales Pitch

Patients are told what they want to hear. A quick admission. Promises of tailored care without a proper assessment. 

Now that’s a problem. 

Legitimate addiction treatment centers should understand the patient, not fill a bed.

 

Letting the Amenities Be the Hero

While comfort is important, there are more things to take care of. When the focus is on “resort-style living” and “five-star amenities”, that’s when you ask what’s happening clinically behind the scenes. Treatment is not the same as a comfortable stay.

 

Billing That Doesn’t Add Up 

Some programs rely heavily on frequent testing or extended stays with little justification. Patients don’t always see this directly. It does, however, show up in how care is structured. 

 

Weak Discharge Planning 

What happens after treatment is not an afterthought. It’s part of the treatment. Programs that lack a path forward leave patients exposed at a vulnerable point in their lives.

 

What Case Managers Can Do

Avoiding bad programs is one part of the job. The other is actively steering patients toward reputable rehab centers.

Start With a Real Assessment

This sounds basic, and yet it’s frequently rushed. 

A solid assessment looks beyond substance use. It includes mental health, living situation, employment, and support systems. Without context, it’s easy to match a patient to the wrong level of care.

 Programs that take this seriously tend to build more effective treatment plans. 

Focus on Evidence, Not Promises 

Holistic. Comprehensive. Personalized. Some of it is meaningful. Some of it is not. 

Case managers should concentrate on a facility’s track record. Southern California has consistently ranked among the most successful rehab hubs. It also has the highest concentration of treatment facilities. Malibu, Orange County, and the Coachella Valley are home to trusted treatment programs in Southern California. Look for:

  • Access to medication-assisted treatment when appropriate
  • Individual therapy
  • Mental health support
  • Structured relapse prevention

South Shores Recovery says that trusted addiction treatment programs offer medically supervised detox programs alongside inpatient rehab.

Check Who is Delivering the Care

Patients should have access to licensed counselors, social workers, and medical professionals. A rotating cast of minimally trained staff is not the same thing.

Outcomes tend to improve when multidisciplinary teams are involved because they look beyond the presenting problem.

Ask Direct Questions

And expect direct answers:

  • How often does the patient meet with a clinician?
  • How is progress measured during the treatment process?

 

Keep the Focus on Independence 

It’s easy for organizations to create dependency. A good case manager does the opposite.

The goal is not to complete a program. It’s to help the patient function outside of it. That includes practical things (housing, work, daily structure) that don’t always get enough attention.

The Case Management Society of America emphasizes these factors as a move toward independence as a core responsibility.

 

FAQs

1. What is the clearest sign of a predatory treatment program?

A sales-driven intake process without a proper clinical assessment is one of the strongest warning signs.

2. How can case managers verify a program’s quality?

Reviewing staff credentials is the first step. Case managers should also ask for detailed treatment schedules. Additionally, they must confirm the use of evidence-based therapies.

3. What should happen after treatment ends?

Patients should leave with an aftercare plan that includes housing, support services, and ongoing recovery resources.

Key Findings

Finding Source
Coordinated care improves outcomes in substance use treatment  NCBI Bookshelf 
Case management improves service access and continuity of care  Rural Health Information Hub 
Some states still lack protections against predatory insurance practices  Opinion piece on PennLive
Long-term recovery is strongly tied to social and economic stability  The New Republic 

 

Addressing Bigger Issues

Some challenges are unfortunately bigger than treatment programs. These include problems around access to medication-assisted treatment and long-term recovery support.

There are a few crucial questions that need to be answered. What if people were paid to stop using drugs? It also discussed financial stability and incentives for recovery outcomes.

Case managers cannot fix systemic issues alone, but they can advocate for resources that support recovery beyond treatment.

 

Author bio

Writer by day, dream catcher by night. Marchelle Abrahams cut her teeth during the infancy of the internet when the dial-up sound of the modem was more than a soundbite at a rave. Not a Millennial and not a Boomer, Marchelle is an in-betweener, making her a special breed of human. As a qualified journalist, Marchelle believes her superpower is stringing a few words together and people reading them. That, and the ability to take her kids on with her unique brand of gnarly comebacks. 

 

 

Please also review AIHCP’s Case Management Certification program and our CE courses as well, to see if they meet your academic and professional goals.  These programs are online and independent study and open to qualified professionals seeking a four year certification

10 Different Career Paths for Medical Professionals Who Want to Help Couples Experiencing Fertility Issues

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

Sonographer doing ultrasound scanning procedure for young woman. Female patient in medical face mask lying on daybed during ultrasonography. Concept of healthcare, medical examination and sonography.Written by Veronica Turner

Approximately 17.5% of adults, or 1 in 6, experience infertility. Giving people access to affordable fertility treatment can improve many people’s ability to start a family.

But even with this access, we still need incredible medical professionals who have the training to educate couples and treat infertility issues at their source. If you choose one of the career paths in this article, you could be one of those professionals who help others with infertility.

 

10 Different Careers in Fertility Medicine

Going into medicine is a noble pursuit, and if you want to focus on fertility medicine, you have plenty of options. Here are 10 different careers in fertility medicine you should explore.

 

Sonographer

A sonographer is a medical professional who uses ultrasonic imaging equipment to diagnose various ailments. Getting an ultrasound during pregnancy is common, as it helps parents determine the age and health of the fetus. Ultrasounds can also be used for fertility issues.

After explaining the process to the patient, sonographers will capture clear ultrasounds of a patient’s uterus, ovaries, and endometrial lining to help physicians diagnose potential problems.

 

Lab Technician

A lab technician is responsible for performing technical, mechanical, and diagnostic tests in a laboratory. A lab technician who works for a fertility clinic or is trained to address fertility issues will use their knowledge to run the lab tests needed for a couple or an individual who is experiencing infertility.

Lab technicians may test samples for the presence or absence of hormones that help with family planning. They’ll also help with ordering supplies and managing equipment.

 

Medical Assistant

A medical assistant does a wide range of tasks, including showing patients to exam rooms, checking their height and weight, and taking them to the exam room. They would do the exact same thing in a fertility clinic, including sterilizing equipment with an autoclave.

A very experienced medical assistant will assist with on-site lab work (but is unlikely to take blood) and explain various fertility treatments or solutions to couples and individuals. They may administer the medications or explain the proper way to take them.

 

Patient Coordinator

A patient coordinator manages administrative tasks to ensure their patients receive comprehensive care. They’re often responsible for educating patients on registration, finances, and insurance companies. Some coordinators may speak to families about their fertility.

For example, they may suggest that patients work with a fertility app like Flo to track their menstrual and ovulation cycle.

 

Registered Nurse

A registered nurse (RN) is a medical professional who provides hands-on care in different medical and community settings. An RN in a fertility clinic could be responsible for administering in-vitro fertilization treatment and teaching patients how to self-administer treatment.

A fertility clinic RN will educate patients about their options before they make a decision. Nurses with a research focus or background, can help researchers come up with new reproductive technologies. A nurse can also pursue various certifications to expand their knowledge.

 

Embryologist

An embryologist works with patients, often indirectly, with fertility. They do this by helping with the different stages of IVF, from retrieval to the egg development and womb transfer. While they aren’t a doctor, their skills allow them to work with delicate cells like sperm cells and eggs.

Embryologists are also responsible for storing these cells for later use and relaying available treatment options to a patient’s doctor if they aren’t able to do this task themselves.

 

Midwife

A midwife can offer prenatal support to expectant patients. Some midwives are able to provide routine reproductive care, like Pap tests, but they often have to work alongside obstetricians and gynecologists. Many mothers choose a midwife to have a non-medicated/natural birth.

In regards to fertility specifically, midwives will provide psychological support and order medical tests to help parents through family planning. They may create comprehensive fertility plans.

 

Gynecologist

A gynecologist is a medical doctor who specializes in treating conditions of the female reproductive system. They administer multiple services and tests, including pelvic exams and pap tests. They’ll also consult patients on menstruation issues, diagnose reproductive diseases, and help with family planning.

If a patient sees a gynecologist for fertility issues, they will conduct fertility monitoring. They’ll also consider how other health problems may impact fertility and create treatment plans.

 

Fertility Specialist

Fertility specialists are trained medical doctors who specialize in infertility-related conditions for both men and women. They’ll educate patients on fertility preservation, infertility treatments, and genetic diseases. Some further specialize in conditions like polycystic ovarian syndrome (POS).

A fertility specialist can administer a wide variety of treatments, including ovulation induction therapy, intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, and testicular sperm extraction (TESE).

 

Urologist

A urologist specializes in treating diseases of the urinary system for both men and women. Since the reproductive systems of males and females are closely linked to the urinary system, a urologist may be needed to diagnose and treat various fertility and reproductive issues.

In some cases, a urologist will conduct analysis on reproductive cells, perform imaging tests, or recommend genetic testing. They often work closely with other reproductive specialists.

In Conclusion…

Fertility issues are difficult to work through on your own. If you pursue one of the career paths listed in this article, you could do a lot to help those experiencing infertility. Many of these careers don’t even require medical school, so you can more easily switch to these roles quickly.

 

 

Author Bio: Veronica Turner is a health and lifestyle writer with over 10 years of experience. She creates compelling content on nutrition, fitness, mental health, and overall wellness.

 

 

Please also review AIHCP’s Case Management Certificate program and see if it meets your academic and professional goals.  These programs are online and independent study and open to qualified professionals seeking a four year certification.

Certified Case Manager Education: What is Population Health?

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

Population Health Management

Today’s Certified Case Manager is becoming more involved in assessing and working with information on population health. Population health looks at the data of an entire group instead of an individual patient and considers not only the general state of health of the population but typical outcomes as well.  “Population health is defined as the health outcomes of a group of individuals, including the distribution of such outcomes within the group.” (1)

 The term “population health” is a broad one and the group examined can be defined in a variety of ways; your chosen population could be a specific town or city, race or even age group. Viewing data across a broad population can help determine the best practices of care for that particular group and allow for that group’s needs to be anticipated and met. A definition of population health is: “The inherent value of a population health perspective is that it facilitates integration of knowledge across the many factors that influence health and health outcomes.” (1).    “The CDC, which has a Division of Population Health, is far wordier and gives more of a functional definition. Population health is interdisciplinary, according to the CDC website, and an approach that uses “nontraditional partnerships” among different sectors of the community — public health, industry, academia, healthcare, local government entities — to achieve positive health outcomes.” (2)  We see more content being added today to Case Manager Certification education curriculums on this interesting and important practice topic.

William Edwards Deming was a scientist and engineer and is best known for his principles of productivity; his approaches are often modeled by organizations looking to boost efficiency and quality while lowering costs. Deming’s involvement was a key component of Japan’s recovery after WWII; he also brought his unique take on the tie between quality and productivity to corporations in the US, including the Ford Motor company. This attention to quality helped Japan rebound after WWII and become a booming economy just a decade later; it also helped Ford and other US car makers understand why Japanese motors were outperforming homegrown products year after year. Applying these same principles to population health can help improve outcomes and as a natural byproduct of that improved care, reduce costs as well.

 

The Deming Philosophy and Healthcare

The Deming philosophy or approach at its most basic states that when an organization focuses on improving quality, costs will naturally fall over time. Case managers work with this philosophy everyday and are at the forefront of guiding quality, cost-effective care.  Conversely, an organization that is focused on costs will find their quality dwindling over time. This philosophy can be applied to a variety of industries – including healthcare. When we focus on improving care and outcomes, we can expect costs to drop; focus too much on costs and the quality of care can easily slip. Case managers know this well and serve as educators today to teach this to others on the health care team.

 

Applying Deming Principles to Healthcare

Managed Care = Managed Processes

The concept of managed care is less about planning the daily work of individual providers and more about the way that the entire process works. The broad approach that is taken to care will have a larger impact on the health of specific populations; engaging and including physicians and providers in the planning process is a must. These providers are the clinicians dealing with clients on a regular basis, and their insight could hold the key to improved overall process and better levels of care.

 

Engaging Physicians in the Process of Care

Including working physicians in the conversation will greatly improve both the approach to care and the outcomes. Doctors, nurses certified case managers and other providers are working “in the trenches” daily and already have the skills and knowledge to predict what methods will work and what will not. Incorporating frontline care providers in conversations about population health is a must if we are going to properly serve that population and understand what will work (and what won’t).

 

Accurate and Timely Data is a Must

“In God we trust…and all others must bring data.”
William Edwards Deming

This Deming quote is at the heart of why data is so important. If we can’t measure population health data, there is no way to tell if measures are resulting in improved outcomes, worsened outcomes or having no impact at all. The ability to measure and compare data from a specified population is a must; without accurate data and the ability to analyze it, there is no way to determine if measures designed to improve care have any actual impact at all.

The quality-based approach outlined by Deming offers many advantages and possibilities for population health and for healthcare in general.  For true gains to be made, the right data must be collected and accessible, front-line caregivers need to be involved in the planning process, and a broad approach to care for a specific population needs to be implemented. We need to continue to provide continuing education for our case managers and others on the health care team in the quality improvement process, including the use of quality improvement tools, data collection and appropriate interpretation of data.

Some reasons we should care about population health include; 1) it is people focused, 2) it seeks to improve the health of our society, 3) it helps to reduce costs as society becomes healthier, 4) it promotes medical science to deliver better care, 5) it leads to the ability to provide better access to care, and 6) it promotes better patient engagement (3). As such it fits very well into the role of todays certified case manager. It would be most advantageous if we provide our case managers more continuing education and opportunities to become involved in this area of practice. Becoming more intimately involved in population health will assist case management profession in its ultimate growth and expansion of specialized professional practice.

Are you a licensed health care professional who is interested in becoming a Certified Case Manager? If so, you may want to preview information on our Certification and Fellowship program at the American Academy of Case Management. You may access information here.

References:

  1. David A. Kingdig (Ed.) What is Population Health? Improving Population Health: Policy, Practice, Research. University of Wisconsin. Population Health Sciences.
  2. Karen Appold. Confused About Population Health? You’ve Come to the Right Place. Managed Healthcare Executive. Vol. 30, Issue 10. October 2020.
  3. Christina Rosario. Why is Population Health Important? Advanced Data Systems Corporation. July 8, 2020.

What are the Biggest Data Security Risks in the Healthcare Industry?

Posted on by Joseph Gerard

Padlock and keyhole in a printed circuit. Digital illustration.Written By Lucy Peters

The current global health crisis is doing more than wreaking physical havoc; it is also affecting data security, exposing potentially sensitive patient data and putting the efficient functioning of healthcare organizations at risk. In some parts of the world, there has been a 150% increase in cyber attacks in recent months, with the stress of the pandemic causing many organizations to lose sight of cyber security at a time in which it is most under threat from new advancements in AI and other technologies that make attacks swifter and wider in scope. What are the main threats to data security in the healthcare sector and what steps can be taken to reduce them?

Phishing Attacks

Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, many organizations – including the Oregon Department of Human (ODHS) Services – fell prey to phishing attacks. Indeed, the latter suffered a breach affecting some 645,000 patients, compromising over two million emails after just nine employees responded to a phishing email. In order to counter this threat, organizations need to rely on technology such as multi-factor authentication to prevent malicious emails from making it to employees’ inboxes. Employee training is equally important in preventing cyber attacks; in some organizations, simulated phishing software is being used to train and test employees’ abilities to respond to such a threat. Investing in training is a highly efficient way to combat a problem that is costing companies hundreds of billions of dollars every year.

Insider Breaches

Research by Egress has found that about 63% of healthcare data breaches are caused by human error, while around 20% are caused by sending information to the wrong recipient. The famous UW Medicine breach (which exposed the data of around 947,000 patients) was caused by a misconfigured server that made private documents accessible to the public. Healthcare organizations should set up identity access management rules to be followed strictly by staff. They should also implement controls covering the printing of sensitive documents. New content aware print management tech tracks information on who printed a document, where it was printed, and the contents of a document. This can boost compliance and minimize security breaches.

Cloud Security

Research by MarketsandMarkets indicates that the cloud model is increasingly appealing for healthcare decision makers, as most organizations need solutions to deal with an exponential growth of patient data. The benefits of the cloud are indubitable, yet alongside them comes a host of new threats — including malware and ransom attacks. Solutions to the problem include performing regular backups (these should be stored offline or in a separate network from the main one), encryption, and the conduction of a full cyber risk assessment on all third party vendors and contractors.

The healthcare industry is increasingly relying on digital sources for the storing of sensitive data. Some of the main threats it faces include phishing, insider breaches, and cloud security issues. These can be tackled both through education of personnel and through the adoption of effective solutions such as efficient IT management services, a regular backup system, encryption, and the reliance on a professional IT team that is on the beat when it comes to new developments in cybersecurity threats – including AI-based threats.

 

 

 

Please also review AIHCP’s Case Management program and see if it matches your academic and professional goals.  The program in online and independent study and open to qualified professionals seeking a Case Management Program

Become a Certified Case Manager and Help Hospitals.

Posted on by Dominick Flarey

The article, “6 ways hospitals can reduce length of stays”, by Katie Sullivan states

“As hospitals and healthcare systems pinch pennies and look for ways to operate more efficiently,  a new CentralLogic report reveals six simple steps they can take to reduce length of stay and increase on-time discharge.”

American Institute Health Care Professionals’ insight:

Case Management is about quality for the patient but also reduction of price for both the institution as well as the patient.

This article looks over some simple steps to help hospitals run more financially smooth. This is very important because good case management can help hospitals and patients save funds and also improve quality assurance.

If you are someone looking to become a certified case manager, then please review our program.  If our program matches your professional and academic needs, you could become a certified case manager.

#howtobecomeacasemanager

See on www.fiercehealthcare.com

Become a certified case manager

Posted on by Dominick Flarey
Become a certified case manager
Become a certified case manager and enter into the field of health care reform

The article, “What Healthcare Reform Means for Providers”, by BHM Marketing states

“Healthcare Reform has brought about many changes, especially for providers. Failure to comply can result in substantial penalties. Are you ready? Are you complying 100%?”

American Institute Health Care Professionals’ insight:

Certified case managers should have a strong understanding of how the new health care law will effect providers.

Dealing with providers and patients and how payments are given under health care is an everyday affair for health care managers.  Hence, this article will be of some use for those who have not investigated many of the new issues.  This article  looks at regulatory and cost issues that health care providers will have to deal with in the new future.

If you are interested in case management or would like to learn how to become a certified case manager, then please review the program.

See on www.bhmpc.com